Research

Current Studies

The Oh Kali Project: Digital mental health for at-risk youth and their caregivers (click HERE to learn more!)

oh-kali project description

Caregiver Study: Identifying barriers to program use for caregivers with justice-involved youth (click HERE to learn more!)

caregiver 2

 

AMHI study logo

 

Past Studies

The Appalachian Mind Health Initiative (AMHI) Study: Evaluating eCBT for adults dealing with major depression

Rosie's campers group photo

Research Opportunities

Postdoctoral Research

-Dive into advanced research with our team. For more information, email lbanderson@usf.edu.

Undergraduate and Graduate Student Research Assistantships

-Gain valuable research experience while contributing to impactful projects. Interested candidates can email lbanderson@usf.edu

Additional Internship Opportunities

-We are also seeking a Social Media and Outreach Intern. View more information HERE. Interested candidates can email lbanderson@usf.edu

Recent Publications

  • Bossarte, Robert M., Eric L. Ross, Howard Liu, Brett Turner, Corey Bryant, Nur Hani Zainal, Victor Puac-Polanco, et al. 2023. Development of a Model to Predict Combined Antidepressant Medication and Psychotherapy Treatment Response for Depression Among Veterans. Journal of Affective Disorders.

    Background: Although research shows that more depressed patients respond to combined antidepressants (ADM) and psychotherapy than either alone, many patients do not respond even to combined treatment. A reliable prediction model for this could help treatment decision-making. We attempted to create such a model using machine learning methods among patients in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

    Methods: A 2018-2020 national sample of VHA patients beginning combined depression treatment completed self-report assessments at baseline and 3 months (n = 658). A learning model was developed using baseline self-report, administrative, and geospatial data to predict 3-month treatment response defined by reductions in the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology Self-Report and/or in the Sheehan Disability Scale. The model was developed in a 70 % training sample and tested in the remaining 30 % test sample.

    Results: 30.0 % of patients responded to treatment. The prediction model had a test sample AUC-ROC of 0.657. A strong gradient was found in probability of treatment response from 52.7 % in the highest predicted quintile to 14.4 % in the lowest predicted quintile. The most important predictors were episode characteristics (symptoms, comorbidities, history), personality/psychological resilience, recent stressors, and treatment characteristics.

    Limitations: Restrictions in sample definition, a low recruitment rate, and reliance on patient self-report rather than clinician assessments to determine treatment response limited the generalizability of results.

    Conclusions: A machine learning model could help depressed patients and providers predict likely response to combined ADM-psychotherapy. Parallel information about potential harms and costs of alternative treatments would be needed, though, to inform optimal treatment selection.

    Keywords: Antidepressant medication; Clinical decision support; Depression; Machine learning; Treatment response; Veterans Health Administration.