Nathan Schilaty

INTRODUCTION: It is well documented that marked weakness of the quadriceps is present after knee joint injury. This joint trauma induces a presynaptic reflex inhibition of musculature surrounding the joint, termed arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI). The extent to which anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury affects thigh musculature motor unit activity, which may affect restoration of thigh muscle strength after injury, is undetermined.

METHODS: A randomized protocol of knee flexion and extension isometric contractions (10%-50% maximal voluntary isometric contraction) were performed for each leg on 54 subjects with electromyography array electrodes placed on the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris. Longitudinal assessments for motor unit recruitment and average firing rate were acquired at 6-month intervals for 1 year post ACL injury.

RESULTS: The ACL-injured population demonstrated smaller quadriceps and hamstrings motor unit size (assessed via motor unit action potential peak-to-peak amplitude) and altered firing rate activity in both injured and uninjured limbs compared to healthy controls. Motor unit activity remained altered compared to healthy controls at 12 months post ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

DISCUSSION: Motor unit activity was altered after ACLR up to 12 months post-surgery. Further research is warranted to optimize rehabilitation interventions that adequately address altered motor unit activity and improve safety and success with return to sport after ACLR. In the interim, evidence based clinical reasoning with a focus on development of muscular strength and power capacity should be the impetus behind rehabilitation programming to address motor control deficits.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is an extremely prevalent issue with an extensive impact, ranging from decreased quality of life to lost years of productivity. Many interventions have been developed to alleviate chronic lower back pain, yet it remains a widespread problem. The objective of this study was to examine the role of artificial intelligence guided resistance training relative to clinical variables in subjects experiencing lower back pain.

METHODS: 69 out of 108 enrolled and 92 accrued subjects completed the 8-week intervention. Subjects were randomized into four groups (Control, Training, Clinical, or Combined). The Training cohort received supervised artificial-intelligence-guided core-focused resistance training while the Clinical group received clinical care. The Combined group received both clinical care and artificial-intelligence-guided training and the Control group received no treatment. Participants were evaluated using functional testing and patient-reported outcomes at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.

FINDINGS: In the clinical tests, the Clinical and Combined cohorts showed increased total time for isometric extensor endurance and the Clinical cohort increased total distance traveled in the 6-min walk test at 8 weeks. The Training, Clinical, and Combined groups showed improvements in Patient-reported outcomes after 8 weeks. Most of the significant improvements were only seen at the 8-week evaluation for both the clinical evaluations and Patient-reported outcomes. The Control group did not show significant improvements in any outcome measures.

INTERPRETATION: The present data indicate that core-focused interventions, including artificial-intelligence-guided moderate-resistance exercise, can increase objective functional outcomes and patient satisfaction using Patient-reported outcomes in individuals with lower back pain.